Comments on: Setting Design Report, Part 24: Getting Specific, Part 7: Lostant in Detail /setting-design-report-part-24-getting-specific-part-7-lostant-in-detail/ a Christian podcast about tabletop RPGs and collaborative storytelling Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:32:33 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.8 By: Peter Martin /setting-design-report-part-24-getting-specific-part-7-lostant-in-detail/#comment-25080 Sun, 22 Jul 2018 23:25:54 +0000 /?p=2211#comment-25080 Glad you’re enjoying it, Richard! Also: that’s a solid observation on the racial descriptors. I may go back and edit the post to make that more clear if I get a minute.

]]> By: Richard Lorenz /setting-design-report-part-24-getting-specific-part-7-lostant-in-detail/#comment-25078 Fri, 20 Jul 2018 02:57:32 +0000 /?p=2211#comment-25078 This is amazing work. I would love to create something like this for my gaming group. I have not read the whole series, but I want to go back and ready everything. You have inspired me to start over with my own efforts at world-building.

On a more technical note, you mentioned the races of most of the people right off the bat, but not all of them. I noticed it especially when you started the Movers & Shakers session, and said the Wallstones were dwarves. I was confused, and had to backtrack to see if you were still talking about the same people from earlier. Now, this may have been sheer exhaustion on my part. I just like consistency in what I am reading. If you mention someone is a half-orc or an elf, but neglect to mention the race of others, I just assume they are humans.

I know this is not critical to the content of the blog, but thought you might appreciate hearing some critical feedback rather than more fanboy gushing over how awesome this blog series is turning out.

]]>