Yearly Archives: 2014


Episode 53 – Humility (Virtues & Vices, Part 14)


Download this episode (right click and save)

Our Virtues & Vices series concludes with a look at humility! Peter’s published again in Sojourn Volume 2 and our fundraiser for The Bodhana Group is nearly wrapped up, and well past its goal! There’s also an ongoing discussion we’d like you participate in—essentially, we’re looking for suggestions and improvements for the coming year. After all that, we talk over humility in characters and at the gaming table, and conclude with a special thank-you to our listeners and wishes for a merry Christmas and an awesome New Year.

Scripture: Psalm 131, Matthew 11:29-30, Philippians 2:3-11


Blog: Merry Christmas!

Normally at this point, you’d get 700-1000 words of my musing about gaming, Christianity, introvertedness, or something else that touches on the podcast’s topic stable here. But it’s the holidays, and I work in retail, and therefore I’ve been reduced to a shambling Christmas zombie. So instead of a blog post, I offer the following holiday wishes.

To our Christian listeners: Merry Christmas! I hope the joy of the season and the love of both Christ and your loved ones are with you.

To our non-Christian listeners who celebrate another seasonal holiday: Happy Holidays! As you celebrate Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Festivus, or whatever other winter holiday you choose, I hope the time is enjoyable and meaningful.

To everyone who uses the Gregorian calendar: Happy New Year! We’re planning another live episode for the 8th of January—our annual resolutions episode. The last live episode was an absolute blast. You should come join us for this one.

And that’s all I’ve got. I hope your holidays, and any holiday gaming you manage to do are awesome. And I’ll be back with more blog entries in the new year.

—Peter


Episode 52 – Pride (Virtues & Vices, Part 13)


Download this episode (right click and save)

It’s only Grant and Peter this episode, as we head into the final pair in our Virtues & Vices series! First, we talk about our ongoing (and quickly wrapping up) fundraiser for The Bodhana Group, and give Innroads Ministries some much-deserved plugs as well. Then we explore what C.S. Lewis called “the complete anti-God state of mind”—Pride. Some theological and practical definitions of pride get discussed before we explore pride as a character trait, and its manifestation at the gaming table.

Also mentioned in this episode: Episode 33 of Saving the Game, “Our Origin Stories (with Mike Perna)”; Peter’s Evil Overlord Guide.

Scripture: Jeremiah 9:23-24, Matthew 23:8-12, , 1 Corinthians 3:5-9


Blog: Putting Down The Sword

The meme of “murder hobos” has been a prevalent one in gaming discussion lately. If you’re not familiar with the concept, it’s exactly what it sounds like: PCs that wander around killing stuff, often seemingly for its own sake. Violence has been part of RPGs from the beginning; after all, Gygax and Arneson came out of the tabletop wargaming scene when they created D&D back in the 1970s.

Furthermore, even if Gygax and Arneson had come from more of a dramatic tradition rather than a tactical one, violence would be in there. Shakespeare and the Greek plays are full of bloodshed and mayhem. People have been fighting and killing each other, and for that matter, everything that moves, for ages.

I still can’t help but wonder if we’ve put just a little too much emphasis on participating in it in the RPG world. Our recent discussion about nonviolent conflict has been sharing an orbit in my mind with This War of Mine, a game about surviving in a war zone as civilians. In our last episode, Devon mentioned that nonviolent conflict resolution tends to keep stories moving faster, and that’s very true.

However, if you’re anything like me, suggestions and ideas are always welcome in these situations, so here’s a list of scenario ideas and media that might help you along if you want to put more non-violent action in your game.

• Rescue operations where PCs have to sneak someone or a group of someones out of a hostile area under the noses of superior forces can be incredibly intense and cool. The real-life example that comes to mind most quickly is the Underground Railroad where abolitionists snuck slaves out of the South in pre-Civil War America.

• As we mentioned in the episode, heists that have to go off stealthily are wonderfully entertaining experiences, both from the planning and execution sides of things. Some of the most memorable gaming stories I have to this day come from Grant’s Savage Shadowrun game in a scenario that centered around sabotaging a soft drink release.

• I feel like I mention this all the time, but large-scale events like natural disasters or even extreme weather are a great bit of seasoning for these types of events. If you’re trying to be stealthy, a violent rainstorm is potentially a huge boon as the wall of rain obscures vision and the sound of it obscures other noises and washes away muddy footprints on hard ground. Natural disasters, especially ones you can see coming, provide a great opportunity for players to exercise their ingenuity. Remember how everyone was screaming at their televisions over the lots full of school buses after Hurricane Katrina? This lets your player characters avert situations like that in a safe, fictional setting.

• Races can be interesting too, in either the traditional competitive sense, or in a higher-stakes one where the PCs are trying to outrun a hostile force of some kind to some key point. Trying to get through to an important leader with diplomatic documents before a foreign envoy that wants to start a war does would make for a very tense scenario.

• If there’s anything This War Of Mine has impressed on me, it’s that just trying to survive and find resources is a very compelling struggle on its own. Playing a few games of This War of Mine or Neo Scavenger will probably do the same for you. The games do feature some violence, but it’s not something you enter into lightly or usually even willingly. This could be a whole campaign (the base idea works especially well for post-apocalyptic scenarios) or something to add spice to an existing game.

• Exploration and treasure hunting can make for an exciting time, and the themes fit any number of games from historical-style New World exploration to hunting through the Dream Realms in a fantasy game to colonizing a new planet in science fiction. GMs wanting to provide this experience for their players would be well-served by looking up some of the more interesting things here on Earth. Keep in mind also that you don’t have to be the first people or sapient beings to ever reach a particular place for it to be interesting. Finding new human civilizations in a low-fantasy world is exciting and mysterious.

• Escape scenarios, particularly prison breaks make for some great adventures. Watch The Great Escape and The Shawshank Redemption (no hardship) for ideas. The book The Great Escape was based on is even better and more replete with ideas.

• Grand-scale projects always have problems. The PCs can be the people who make sure an ambitious venture is able to keep going. Some ideas for the project itself include transportation networks (roads, railroads, portal networks, seaports, a space elevator), fortifications (the Great Wall, a castle, a defensive space station), or science and industry (a skyscraper, a specialized manufacturing facility, the Large Hadron Collider). Snags include shortages (of manpower, materials, or money), bureaucracy, shifting circumstances or terrain, difficult deadlines, and poor planning on the part of the organizers that has to be worked around.

• Politics, diplomacy, and intrigue. And not even just Westeros-style conniving. Putting the PCs in charge of getting a good-hearted (but maybe somewhat uncontrollable) NPC politician elected in a democratic society could make for a whole campaign.

• Investigations, mysteries, and puzzles are an old-standby, but for good reason. If you particularly enjoy this type of game, looking at the GUMSHOE line of games from Pelgrane Press is highly recommended.

Hopefully that list will be enough to get you started – I know that I’m excited to put more of this in my games when I start GMing again. If you have any further ideas or comments, we’d love to hear them. Comment on the article or get in touch with us via social media.


Episode 51 – Non-Violent Conflict Resolution (with Devon Kelley)


Download this episode (right click and save)

Devon Kelley from the Shark Bone Podcast joins Grant, Peter and Branden in a discussion of one of Devon’s favorite RPG topics: Non-violent conflict resolution! Devon plugs a game of his own—Threshold: Tragic Superheroes, available through DriveThruRPG—and we plug our ongoing holiday fundraiser for The Bodhana Group. Then we dive (har har—you’re welcome, Devon) into our scripture and our topic. We discuss why non-combat conflict resolution is often overlooked in RPGs; why it’s important; how to encourage it, as a player and as a GM; and plenty of real-world examples of this sort of play.

Scripture: Jeremiah 29:7, Matthew 26:47-54, John 13:34-35, and 1 Peter 3:9-11


Blog: Community at a Distance

“And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds, not giving up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging one another—and all the more as you see the Day approaching.

Hebrews 10:24-25

I’ve made no secret to anyone who knows me (or anyone who listens to the podcast) that I sit on the “introvert” side of the introvert-extrovert spectrum. It may come off as odd or even inaccurate to some, because my job is fairly asocial. I work in shipping and receiving, and for most of the year, I am a one-man department. Because of this, unlike a lot of introverts, I still have some social energy left in the evenings because my work doesn’t drain it away, so friends often see a fairly lively, energetic side of me.

Or at least, they hear it. The blessing and the curse of the internet is that many of the people I consider my closest friends live in other states. I’ve never met some of them in person, though I’ve talked with them via VOIP services and game with some of them almost every week. I hope to meet them face-to-face at a convention one of these days.

And yet, that geographic separation doesn’t make them any less my actual friends – in fact, I’d argue the opposite is true. Much like the more somber, slower pace of traditional services help put me in a better frame of mind for worship on Sunday morning, I often make friends better via the internet. I even met my wife that way. The slower pace of communications provided by forums and social media allows me to connect better with people, at least on a first-impression sort of basis. And it’s typically less jarring and therefore easier to back out of a social media or forum conversation (or even end a VOIP call) than it is to leave a social gathering.

Some of the extroverts reading this are probably bristling now, ready with all kinds of admonitions that “internet socializing doesn’t count.” To which I can only say: which is more important to you – physical proximity, or mental and emotional engagement?

To shift gears slightly, this is one of the things that is also nice about gaming. It gives you another context so socialize in, with reasonably clear rules of engagement and something that all the participants are already invested in to talk about. Planning a job in Shadowrun or meticulously working your way through a dungeon crawl provides a greater level of conversational depth than simply talking about the weather, or at least it can. I’d argue it should.

By contrast, church can be an intimidating place, especially to the uninitiated. There are tons of rules, almost all of them unspoken, and the penalties for breaking them can be severe.  I think that sometimes we as Christians can get a little arbitrary of what we expect of people. Talking with other folks in the “geeky faith” community like my cohosts, Derek White, and Mike Perna DOES count as fellowship with other believers. If a new Christian is more comfortable fellowshipping with other believers at a slower pace online – that counts. If a long-time Christian is having problems with social anxiety or social fatigue and does the same thing – it still counts. To come back around to my earlier point, meeting together is being mentally present with each other, giving of your time and attention instead of merely displacing the air an arbitrary number of feet away from them.

Now, I’m not about to suggest that introverts and/or gamers of faith should never darken a church’s door. There are a lot of things churches offer, particularly if you get involved. Opportunities to start “checking off some of the boxes” in the parable of the sheep and the goats are a big one. For example, I’d never have gotten involved with the local food pantry if not for some of the folks at my church, who opened that door for me. Another benefit is the ability to make connections with people who may not be as comfortable with technology. At 36, I’m about half the age of most of the folks who attend the traditional worship service I go to at my church. You’re not likely to find most people in their seventies on Facebook unless you’re one of their grandchildren (and even then you may not), but they often make fantastic mentors and role models. They have, after all, seen a lot of life in all those years. And there is something profoundly moving about being at a traditional candlelight Christmas service that no amount of high-definition video will ever replicate.

Still, I think there is a tremendous amount to be gained by taking advantage of the modern ability to engage folks we’d have never known existed in ages past. I’ve made real, lasting friendships, been challenged in my entrenched views, had some fantastic games, and grown in my faith – all without ever leaving my home.


Episode 50 – Live – Making Interesting Characters (Part 2)


Download this episode (right click and save)

It’s Part Two of the special LIVE recording we did with listener questions to celebrate fifty episodes of STG! Thanks again to everyone who participated, and thanks to everyone who’s kept us going all this time! If you missed it, you can re-watch the whole, unedited show on YouTube or listen to Part One right here.

Scripture: Proverbs 17:17, Romans 8:35, James 1:2-4


Blog: Who Do You Play?

During our live episode, I asked Grant, mostly rhetorically, what kind of characters I play. My intention was to illustrate for the audience that I tend to play an archetype and then segue into noting that this is a fairly common practice. In so doing, I reminded myself of something I should have remembered, namely: “Don’t ask Grant a question unless you’re ready for an insightful answer.”

Because Grant gave me an answer that I really didn’t expect (though I probably should have): “You.” And then he went on to enumerate his supporting evidence for that statement, which was more plentiful than I consciously realized.

Still, there’s no denying that I put myself into my characters; up until recently, they almost all even shared my own eye and hair coloration (gray/brown). Player characters of mine are usually some member or former member of the “protector class” – military, espionage, or law enforcement. In a fantasy setting, they are typically tied to a god of protection, justice, or similar concepts. For reasons I mentioned in Episode 50, a lot of them had facial scars.

Something that few of you will know is that for years I was planning on a career in law enforcement. Learning what effects getting that wish would have on the rest of my life took the bloom off that rose, but I still have a deep appreciation for what Lt. Col Dave Grossman refers to as “sheepdogs” because I have a good idea what they sacrifice and put up with in order to fill those roles in society. Still, as much as I admire the sheepdogs in real life, that’s only part of why I like playing them.

Protectors typically have access that more mundane folks do not. The character that probably represented the “peak” of the archetype described above was a superhero called Overwatch that I played in a Mutants & Masterminds game years ago. Despite having fewer points in his powers than any of the other PCs, he was (by unanimous agreement) the most effective character in the game. You’ll notice I said “effective” and not “powerful” there. Let me explain.

Overwatch had been in the Chicago PD, and the US Air Force and at the start of the game was working for the DHS. He had the power of arrest and official credentials. Furthermore, he had investigational skills and the mindset of a law enforcer. That meant that he could walk into a bank or convenience store and get access to their security camera feeds just by asking and nobody was suspicious of his motives. He could patrol an area in an unmarked law enforcement vehicle, but if he needed traffic out of his way, it was as simple as flipping on the lights and siren. He could get dossiers on known bad guys. He knew how to look for what was out of place in a scene, and unlike most superheroes, if someone came after him, on or off duty, they were messing with a sworn officer of the law, not some random civilian. With all of that, his flight, low-level super-strength and potent spatial manipulation abilities were just icing on the cake.

Paladins in a lot of fantasy settings enjoy similar benefits, and even former members of these professions retain their skills. They also benefit from a solid potential mix of brains, brawn, and social abilities, making them useful in a wide variety of situations in play. Given all of that, is it any wonder I enjoy that archetype so much?

Still, if for no other reason than I think Grant is getting sick of “Peter Characters,” I’ll probably try to break out of that wheelhouse next time I make a new PC. If nothing else, it’ll be interesting to see how well I take to playing, for example, a wizard or a druid in a fantasy game, or perhaps a hacker or con man in a modern one.

At the very least, it’ll give us something else to talk about on the podcast.


Episode 50 – Live – Making Interesting Characters (Part 1)


Download this episode (right click and save)

For our 50th episode, we wanted to do something a little special: A live episode recorded via Hangouts On-Air, with listener questions and responses! It turned out amazingly well, and we’re excited to do another one in the future. Thanks to everyone who participated, and thanks to everyone who’s kept us going for fifty episodes and more! If you missed it, you can re-watch the whole, unedited show on YouTube (and marvel at the amount of editing Branden does to make our episodes sound halfway decent.)

Show notes: Our fundraiser for The Bodhana Group has started, and you can help us support their excellent work here! Also, visit our store, and buy something for someone you think might like the show and the gift—Christmas is coming up, after all.

Scripture: Proverbs 17:17, Romans 8:35, James 1:2-4


Blog: Close to the Edge

Something you all may or may not know: I listen to every episode of Saving the Game after it releases. As the only regular host who has never done audio editing, if I don’t make a conscious effort to listen to the episodes after they’re released, I never get to hear them. Usually, that experience is just a nice refresher of an interesting conversation I had with some friends that happened to be recorded, but every now and then, I get hit with something like this: toward the end of our episode with Ken Hite, Ken asked a question in the segment about horror and Christianity that I didn’t actually answer. Fatigue took over and I wound up going on a rambling tangent, but the question was good enough that after listening to the final episode and facepalming for a few minutes, I decided that it still deserved an answer.

The question was: “Any times when you’ve been playing horror games and thinking ‘oh, that was a little close to the edge for me’?”

My answer back on the 2nd when we recorded was a long rambling monologue about using Christian tropes in horror, which completely missed the point of the question and also kind of cut my co-hosts off from that conversational road by the time it was over. (Sorry guys; I was not at my best that evening.)

The real answer is “Yes,” but the specific games weren’t ones which I had in mind at the time.  The first example was in my friend Kevin’s Ravenloft game which I’ve referenced a number of times on the podcast. Why I didn’t remember it at the time of the recording is beyond me; Ravenloft is a horror setting, Branden brought Ravenloft up earlier in the podcast, and the Ravenloft game was one of my favorites of all time.

The point of the Ravenloft game was that the player characters were Dark Lords of Ravenloft that were getting second chances and didn’t remember; I was given Lord Soth to play (though I didn’t realize it until much later; Kevin’s GMing skills made that revelation alone a pretty unsettling turn of events). During one of the sessions where my PC finally came to grips with who and what he was, Kevin co-opted me to play him as the evil person he used to be, and he did some pretty dark and cruel things. Ultimately, the rest of the party broke him out of the cycle of replaying evil memories and he was a changed (if still flawed) person, but that was pretty unsettling.

The second incident was at Fear the Con 7, in a con game of Ragnarok: Fate of the Norns. The story had us, a bunch of Viking warriors, fighting against some “servants of the White God” – Crusaders with the serial numbers filed off. The game didn’t hammer on present-day Christianity at all, and in fact portrayed the Crusader analogs as pretty nasty, awful people (which a lot of them were). But when the party tracked several of them down and slew them, I still felt weird about it.

And I think those incidents both point to the same thing: sometimes the stuff that makes you the most uncomfortable has the potential to teach you the most if you can take some time and think about it afterward. The Ravenloft game taught me that playing evil, monstrous player characters, even in the short-term, was going to hold the ugly parts of my own soul up in a way that I didn’t like; while there is some value in coming to grips with one’s own dark side, I wonder if, at some point, it’s just “feeding the bad wolf.” The Ragnarok game made confront some lingering “nationalism” over Christianity, which is something I still wonder about the lines with. There are pretty clear directives in scripture, particularly in the writings of Paul, to love each other in the church, but what do you do when a believer you have no way of influencing publicly espouses things you feel are wrong, or even downright despicable? What are the rules of engagement with co-religionists who have “snapped” and gone off the deep end in one way or another? And how do I react when the roles are flipped and someone confronts me? I don’t have those answers, and I wish I did. Sometimes when you get close to the line, you can see why, how, and what you need to do differently. And sometimes? It’s as murky as the mists of Ravenloft.

—Peter